Feeld Users Reject AI in Dating Apps, Favor Human Interaction
63% of Feeld users oppose AI in dating apps. Founders should focus on human-centric features to maintain trust and user satisfaction.
AI dominated discussions at the GDI Conference in London, where industry leaders debated its role in online dating. The central question was whether AI should protect users and improve matching, or whether it should actively participate in their conversations. The consensus leaned heavily toward keeping AI in a supporting role rather than replacing human interaction.
Nathan Studholme, Head of Product at Feeld, and Alexandra Kilpatrick, Head of UX Research, presented findings from a survey of 9,000 people about the use of AI in dating. While the industry is keen to adopt AI, 63% of Feeld users viewed its use in dating apps negatively, rising to 84% among female users. Respondents were more comfortable with AI being used to detect fake profiles, scams, risky behaviour and harassment than to write messages or steer conversations. Some 43% of Feeld users wanted no AI at all, while 30% preferred AI features to be optional.
AI should protect the dating experience, not participate in it.
The Fork in the Road for Dating Apps
Karima Ben Abdelmalek, CEO of happn, made a similar argument about the future of AI in dating. She said we are at a fork in the road where the industry must choose between automating connection until AI begins replacing people, or keeping AI in a supporting role with humans at the centre. AI can improve matching, detect fraud and identify fake accounts. However, using it to write messages or conduct conversations could further damage trust in dating apps.
Karima said 41% of happn users felt uneasy about the effect of AI on human connection. Only one in ten said they would consider dating an AI. Her recommendation was clear and aligned with Feeld's findings.
AI should protect users and help them find suitable people, but it should never pretend to be one.
Academic Research Reveals Generational Attitudes
New academic research provides another view of how daters may respond to these tools. The study, AI on Dating Apps: Links Between Usage Frequency, Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem, and Willingness to Use AI, was written by Alice Binder, Anja Stevic, Jaroslava Kaňková and Jörg Matthes. The research focused on younger users and their relationship with AI-powered dating features.
The researchers surveyed 693 dating-app users aged between 16 and 27. They examined whether people who frequently use dating apps feel more able to understand and influence their algorithms. They also looked at whether that confidence affects their willingness to use AI.
Frequent dating-app users were more open to using AI for writing messages, improving profiles and selecting potential matches. Users who felt more confident about controlling an app's algorithm were also more willing to use AI for communication, curation, fraud detection and profile verification. Women were less willing than men to use AI for communication and profile curation.
Bridging Industry Concerns and User Familiarity
The findings do not necessarily contradict the concerns raised at GDI. They suggest that familiarity with dating apps can make people more comfortable with AI. However, the gender divide remains consistent across both industry surveys and academic research, with women showing significantly less enthusiasm for AI participation in dating conversations. This presents a challenge for dating platforms trying to balance innovation with user trust and comfort levels.
- Dating platforms should prioritize AI for safety and fraud detection rather than conversation automation to maintain user trust
- There is a significant gender gap in AI acceptance, with women consistently more skeptical of AI involvement in dating interactions
- Familiarity with dating apps increases comfort with AI features, suggesting education and transparency may help adoption
Key takeaways
- 0163% of Feeld users and 41% of happn users view AI in dating apps negatively.
- 02Users prefer AI for safety features, not for writing messages or steering conversations.
- 03A significant gender gap exists, with women consistently more skeptical of AI involvement.
- 04Frequent app users and those confident with algorithms show greater willingness to use AI.
- 05Dating platforms should use AI to protect users, not to participate in conversations.
Reviewed by an operator. Last updated September 18, 2026. High Intent is led by founder and CEO Bill Alena, backed by a team of industry experts with over 100 years of online dating experience between them.
Questions operators ask
Many dating app users view AI integration negatively. 63% of Feeld users and 41% of happn users expressed unease or opposition, especially regarding AI writing messages or participating in conversations. The consensus leans toward AI serving a supporting, protective role rather than replacing human interaction.
Have a tip, a correction, or a pitch?
We're the people who write and edit this newsroom. Write to us directly, we reply within one business day.
Sources are protected. We reply personally.
The weekly editorial for operators in the dating industry.
Long form opinion from people who have built and sold dating businesses. Read past editions.